[Talk-ca] Proposal: Cleanup of NHN ways in BC

[Paul Norman]

As an aside, the imports in the lower mainland were not done by Sam, but by
mbiker. I'm not sure on the exact import process used for the NRN data. If I
were to do the imports over again myself I think I'd use CanVec 7.0 which
seems to have the same data but I haven't evaluated it in any detail.

-----Original Message-----
From: Sam Vekemans [mailto:acrosscanadatrails at gmail.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, February 22, 2011 6:52 AM
To: Kevin Michael Smith; Talk-CA OpenStreetMap
Subject: Re: [Talk-ca] Proposal: Cleanup of NHN ways in BC

Cool, if i knew how to edit a stylesheet i would  :) So t hat's fine.


So perhaps then it can be all changed with a bot?


... or is it better to simply wipe my edits?



The rivers (without oneway=yes tag) is available in another api, so it's no
big deal.


cheers,
Sam


On 2/22/11, Kevin Michael Smith <smithkm at draconic.ca> wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-02-22 at 06:34 -0800, Sam Vekemans wrote:
>> Great! Were getting somewhere..
>>
>>
>> Now lets discuss the most appropriate tag that can be used to 
>> indicate the rendering of a flow line arrow.
>
> It's not about tagging the rivers to say 'there should be an arrow 
> here', it's about putting 'Rivers have arrows' in the style sheet for
> the renderer.   'Having arrows' isn't a property of the river, it's a
> property of how we may or may not want to display it.
>
> --
> Kevin Michael Smith <smithkm at draconic.ca>
>


--
Twitter: @Acrosscanada
Blogs: http://acrosscanadatrails.posterous.com/
http://Acrosscanadatrails.blogspot.com
Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/sam.vekemans
Skype: samvekemans
IRC: irc://irc.oftc.net #osm-ca Canadian OSM channel (an open chat room)
@Acrosscanadatrails

_______________________________________________
Talk-ca mailing list
Talk-ca at openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca