[Talk-ca] Low quality unresolvable notes
James
james2432 at gmail.com
Tue Jul 7 01:28:59 UTC 2015
I'd say close them with a comment. Some of them are actually precise,
saying like : no rtor eb. Which is more than enough data. General things
like: add POIs at this location. Could be closed as the entirety of osm
could be summed in a widespread note saying: Add mapping data. You can use
your jugement and close them.
On Jul 6, 2015 8:34 PM, "Paul Norman" <penorman at mac.com> wrote:
> I've been catching up on local notes, and have come across a few I'm not
> sure how to resolve. There are a number which are equivalent to "There is a
> <some name of shop> somewhere in this block." While probably correct,
> they're not very useful.
>
> The notes aren't bug reports, the original intent of notes/OpenStreetBugs.
> They're not precise enough to resolve, so basically all the information
> they contain is that there are shops here which could be added if a site
> survey was done. A site survey would be nice, but there's plenty of areas
> where that is so - if someone opened up notes everywhere they were needed
> in the area, they'd make other notes less valuable and probably end up
> closed.
>
> I'm leaning towards closing them as not reporting a bug nor providing
> specific enough information to add something to the map, but wanted to get
> the thoughts of others.
>
> I might also bring this up at our next local meetup, see what other locals
> think.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Talk-ca mailing list
> Talk-ca at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ca/attachments/20150706/8d430364/attachment.html>
More information about the Talk-ca
mailing list