[Talk-ca] Tagging forest as a park?

[Clifford Snow]

I didn't even go look at the edit. I've seen so many fake parks lately I
just automatically assumed the worst. My apologies to Denis001 for
 assuming it was related to Pokemon.

On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 5:21 PM, James <james2432 at gmail.com> wrote:

> seeing as it was back in 2015, PoGo didn't exist back then, I think it was
> just a mistake.
>
> On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 7:17 PM, Clifford Snow <clifford at snowandsnow.us>
> wrote:
>
>> It's possible Denis001 edit is an effort to "game" Pokemon. I would
>> recommend fixing the edit and send them a nicely worded welcome message
>> with help in how to edit. I provide new users with a link to this blog on
>> editing for Pokemon, https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2016/12/30/tips-
>> pokemon-go/
>>
>> Clifford
>>
>> On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 1:05 PM, James <james2432 at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> I've noticed something going on in the map:
>>> http://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/relation/1944638
>>>
>>> Denis001 has added leisure=park to a Canvec forest and a Lake's name.
>>> I'm pretty sure that he ment to add it to the lake itself and not the
>>> forest relation. Just wondering what you think? Should I remove
>>> leisure=park and the name tag?
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Talk-ca mailing list
>>> Talk-ca at openstreetmap.org
>>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> @osm_seattle
>> osm_seattle.snowandsnow.us
>> OpenStreetMap: Maps with a human touch
>>
>
>
>
> --
> 外に遊びに行こう！
>



-- 
@osm_seattle
osm_seattle.snowandsnow.us
OpenStreetMap: Maps with a human touch
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ca/attachments/20170222/7a8a3ab9/attachment.html>