[Talk-ca] Tagging forest as a park?

James james2432 at gmail.com
Thu Feb 23 00:21:12 UTC 2017


seeing as it was back in 2015, PoGo didn't exist back then, I think it was
just a mistake.

On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 7:17 PM, Clifford Snow <clifford at snowandsnow.us>
wrote:

> It's possible Denis001 edit is an effort to "game" Pokemon. I would
> recommend fixing the edit and send them a nicely worded welcome message
> with help in how to edit. I provide new users with a link to this blog on
> editing for Pokemon, https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2016/12/30/
> tips-pokemon-go/
>
> Clifford
>
> On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 1:05 PM, James <james2432 at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I've noticed something going on in the map:
>> http://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/relation/1944638
>>
>> Denis001 has added leisure=park to a Canvec forest and a Lake's name. I'm
>> pretty sure that he ment to add it to the lake itself and not the forest
>> relation. Just wondering what you think? Should I remove leisure=park and
>> the name tag?
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Talk-ca mailing list
>> Talk-ca at openstreetmap.org
>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> @osm_seattle
> osm_seattle.snowandsnow.us
> OpenStreetMap: Maps with a human touch
>



-- 
外に遊びに行こう!
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ca/attachments/20170222/ac07644d/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the Talk-ca mailing list