[Talk-ca] Building Import

[Begin Daniel]

Buildings where there is no available municipal data

Sent from Galaxy S7

________________________________
From: John Whelan <jwhelan0112 at gmail.com>
Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2019 9:32:32 AM
To: Begin Daniel
Cc: Talk-ca; keith hartley
Subject: Re: [Talk-ca] Building Import

Are you talking about the older CANVEC data or the data that Stats has released which is really municipal data?

Thanks John

Begin Daniel wrote on 2019-03-28 8:31 AM:
Someone has compared Bing and Canvec data in rural areas?

Sent from Galaxy S7

________________________________
From: OSM Volunteer stevea <steveaOSM at softworkers.com><mailto:steveaOSM at softworkers.com>
Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2019 11:52:02 PM
To: Talk-ca
Cc: keith hartley
Subject: Re: [Talk-ca] Building Import

Ah, good dialog ensues.  Municipality by municipality, in conjunction with BOTH the StatsCan and Bing data, the right things are getting noticed, the right things are getting human-realized at what the next steps are to do.  It gets better.

Yay.  Stitch it together.  One municipality at a time.  One province at a time.  Pretty soon, after a few revisions of data and back-and-forths between municipalities and province-wide data checking, you've got something.  There, you go.

SteveA

> On Mar 27, 2019, at 8:23 PM, keith hartley <keith.a.hartley at gmail.com><mailto:keith.a.hartley at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> The patchwork of municipalities is at least useful, before we didn't have a framework for adding this data, but at least we do now thanks to the umbrella license @ Stats Canada. We're a big country with very few, but very skilled OSM mappers (IE gecho111 mapped all of regina's building footprints! ).
>
> I like the concept of the Bing data, but they may have to do another few tries, or maybe retain their Neural network. - Is there anywhere where the Bing data looks nice? I found burbs in Winnipeg not bad, but there's some really weird elements when the source data is too simple (buildings in the middle of fields) or too complex (urban cores)
>
> On Wed, Mar 27, 2019 at 6:29 AM John Whelan <jwhelan0112 at gmail.com><mailto:jwhelan0112 at gmail.com> wrote:
> The Stats Canada data comes from the municipalities.  Unfortunately there are over 3,000 in Canada so yes ideally each would be treated separately in reality each municipality doesn't have a group of skilled OSM mappers who are capable of setting up an import plan and doing the work although there is nothing to stop them doing so.
>
> Cheerio John


_______________________________________________
Talk-ca mailing list
Talk-ca at openstreetmap.org<mailto:Talk-ca at openstreetmap.org>
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca



_______________________________________________
Talk-ca mailing list
Talk-ca at openstreetmap.org<mailto:Talk-ca at openstreetmap.org>
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca


--
Sent from Postbox<https://www.postbox-inc.com/?utm_source=email&utm_medium=siglink&utm_campaign=reach>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ca/attachments/20190328/17562de7/attachment-0001.html>