[Talk-ca] Which is preferred? Addr:interpolation with a source or adding in actual addresses?
John Whelan
jwhelan0112 at gmail.com
Tue May 23 17:45:20 UTC 2023
I think individual addresses are better but in their absence the
interpolated ones are better than nothing.
Cheerio John
Hoser AB wrote on 5/23/2023 1:06 PM:
> I mostly map in the Calgary area, and manually add addresses one by
> one. I find this is particularly important where buildings may have
> multiple addresses, i.e. where an overall complex is composed of
> multiple buildings with multiple units, or where a unit or business's
> address may not be the same as the building it lies within.
>
> For example this building
> (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/213878776#map=19/51.04573/-114.07918)
> with an overall address of 805 - 8 Ave SW has a bagel shop in it
> (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10239097762#map=19/51.04570/-114.07902)
> with the address 809 - 7 Street SW. Having address interpolations
> along 7 Street is kind of pointless and silly, as the only addresses
> along that side of the street are contained within that one building
> anyway.
>
> Generally in Calgary address interpolations aren't typically on the
> map in the first place, but where I have seen them, e.g. in the hamlet
> of Bragg Creek
> (https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=15/50.9514/-114.5631), I have
> deleted the interpolations as I've added the buildings to the map.
> (And in the case of Bragg Creek, many if not most of the interpolated
> addresses were incorrect to begin with; either backwards or on the
> wrong side of the road.)
>
> If the accuracy of the Bragg Creek interpolations is representative of
> Canvec interpolations overall, I would suggest we don't keep them...
>
>
>
> On Tuesday, May 23, 2023, Pierre-Léo Bourbonnais <leo at leograph.com
> <mailto:leo at leograph.com>> wrote:
>
> Nous (la Chaire Mobilité: username osm: ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy),
> ajoutons manuellement les adresses précises en utilisant des
> sources offficielles, mais cela représente un travail de longue
> haleine pour véiter les erreurs ou les doublons.
> Il ne faut surtout pas importer les addresses en mode automatique,
> car cela va créer des nombreux doublons et il y a plusieurs
> données erronnées dans les sources officielles, qu’il faut
> corriger, ou au moins atténuer.
>
> Habituellement, quand un secteur est complété dans OSM avec toutes
> ses adresses ajoutées manuellement à chaque porte, on peut alors
> supprimer les interpolations d’adresses, qui ne servent plus dans
> ce cas.
>
>
> EN:
>
> We (Chaire Mobilité: username osm: ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy), add
> precise addresses using official sources manually, but this
> represents a long process to avoid errors or duplicates.
> It is important not to import the addresses in batch, because this
> will create many duplicates and there are several erroneous data
> in the official sources, which must be corrected, or at least
> mitigated.
>
> Usually, when a neighbourhood is completed in OSM with all its
> addresses manually added to each entrance, then the address
> interpolations can be removed, which are no longer useful in this
> case.
>
>> On May 23, 2023, at 8:12 AM, Nextonem via Talk-ca
>> <talk-ca at openstreetmap.org <mailto:talk-ca at openstreetmap.org>> wrote:
>>
>>
>> *EN*
>> Hi,
>>
>> here in Montreal, most of the addresses are mapped with
>> addr:interpolation, but its with a source a lot of the times, so
>> i was wondering if it would be worth it to add the actual address
>> for places that have their buildings mapped and then remove the
>> addr:interpolation that exists?
>>
>>
>> *FR (utilisant DeepL)*
>>
>> Bonjour,
>>
>> Ici à Montréal, la plupart des adresses sont cartographiées avec
>> addr:interpolation, mais avec une source la plupart du temps,
>> donc je me demandais si cela valait la peine d'ajouter l'adresse
>> réelle pour les endroits qui ont leurs bâtiments cartographiés et
>> ensuite d'enlever l'addr:interpolation qui existe?
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Talk-ca mailing list
> Talk-ca at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca
--
Sent from Postbox <https://www.postbox-inc.com>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ca/attachments/20230523/b187219e/attachment-0001.htm>
More information about the Talk-ca
mailing list