[Talk-dk] Buildings and addressmarkers

[Thomas Bredøl]

Hej

Nogle har været i gang med at lave dupletter i Kgs. Lyngby [1]. Jeg ved 
ikke om man skal lade dem være eller blanke bygningernes data af?

[1] http://osm.org/go/0NW5nj_vF-

On 06-12-2010 19:08, Morten Kjeldgaard wrote:
>
> On 06/12/2010, at 17.29, Thies Pierdola wrote:
>
>> Hi Danmark,
>>
>> with the new Bing dataset released, I started drawing buildings.
>>
>> One simple question came up, what do I do with kms/address markers?
>>
>> 1) Leave them as they are?
>
> Yes, please. We would like the OSAK nodes to be updated by a bot in 
> the future, and moving them/changing their content will only disturb 
> or complicate that process. If you remove one, it will likely be 
> recreated by the bot when comes along to that street anyway.
>
>> 2) Transfer the data to the new buildings and remove the markers?
>
>> 3) Put them in some kind of relation?
>
> You could duplicate the OSAK information for a building that only 
> contains a single address, and you could create a relation for 
> buildings with more then one address.  But frankly, I don't see the 
> point. The address nodes work fine with routing algorithms, and what 
> else do you need?
>
> On a similar note, I considered assempling streets and address nodes 
> in a associatedStreet relation, on a systematic level it seems 
> logical, but again, I fail to see what it should be used for. A lot of 
> added data and complexity (that needs maintenance) with any real 
> benefits.
>
>> I hope there is some kind of convention about this. For now I leave 
>> them as they are and just draw buildings, as i don't want to mess up 
>> the address data.
>
> That is exactly what we want, AFAIAC :-)
>
> Cheers,
> Morten
>
> _______________________________________________
> Talk-dk mailing list
> Talk-dk at openstreetmap.org
> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-dk

Med venlig hilsen
-- 
Thomas Bredøl aka Broadbeer
Valby Overdrev 10
DK 3200 Helsinge
+45 4042 3492
http://bredol.tel