[Talk-dk] Buildings and addressmarkers
thomas at bredol.dk
Man Dec 6 23:50:53 GMT 2010
Nogle har været i gang med at lave dupletter i Kgs. Lyngby . Jeg ved
ikke om man skal lade dem være eller blanke bygningernes data af?
On 06-12-2010 19:08, Morten Kjeldgaard wrote:
> On 06/12/2010, at 17.29, Thies Pierdola wrote:
>> Hi Danmark,
>> with the new Bing dataset released, I started drawing buildings.
>> One simple question came up, what do I do with kms/address markers?
>> 1) Leave them as they are?
> Yes, please. We would like the OSAK nodes to be updated by a bot in
> the future, and moving them/changing their content will only disturb
> or complicate that process. If you remove one, it will likely be
> recreated by the bot when comes along to that street anyway.
>> 2) Transfer the data to the new buildings and remove the markers?
>> 3) Put them in some kind of relation?
> You could duplicate the OSAK information for a building that only
> contains a single address, and you could create a relation for
> buildings with more then one address. But frankly, I don't see the
> point. The address nodes work fine with routing algorithms, and what
> else do you need?
> On a similar note, I considered assempling streets and address nodes
> in a associatedStreet relation, on a systematic level it seems
> logical, but again, I fail to see what it should be used for. A lot of
> added data and complexity (that needs maintenance) with any real
>> I hope there is some kind of convention about this. For now I leave
>> them as they are and just draw buildings, as i don't want to mess up
>> the address data.
> That is exactly what we want, AFAIAC :-)
> Talk-dk mailing list
> Talk-dk at openstreetmap.org
Med venlig hilsen
Thomas Bredøl aka Broadbeer
Valby Overdrev 10
DK 3200 Helsinge
+45 4042 3492
More information about the Talk-dk