[OSM-talk-fr] Fwd: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting - change vote counting rules - remove dead rule

[Marc_marc]

Bonjour,

Mateusz continue le dépoussière du processus de proposition.
Cette fois-ci il propose de supprimer le bout de phrase
disant que le résultat vote d'une proposition pourrait être ajusté
(sans dire comment) à propos d'autres facteurs (sans dire précisement
quel critère les rend acceptable) tel que "l'utilisation"

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/change_vote_counting_rules_-_remove_dead_rule

Vu que cela n'a jamais été appluqué et que c'est en l'état
totalement inaplicable et que de nommbreux votants en tinnent déjà
compte dans leur vote, cela me semble une simplification
bienvenue.

Cordialement,
Marc
-------- Message transféré --------
Sujet : 	[Tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting - change vote counting
rules - remove dead rule
Date : 	Thu, 18 Feb 2021 19:32:11 +0100 (CET)
De : 	Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging <tagging at openstreetmap.org>
Répondre à : 	Tag discussion, strategy and related tools
<tagging at openstreetmap.org>
Pour : 	Tag discussion, strategy and related tools
<tagging at openstreetmap.org>
Copie à : 	Mateusz Konieczny <matkoniecz at tutanota.com>



https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/change_vote_counting_rules_-_remove_dead_rule
<https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/change_vote_counting_rules_-_remove_dead_rule>

Votes and other feedback are welcomed!

--------

Rationale, copied from wiki page:

One of barriers for new contributors in various projects (from ones
like OSM to companies and governments and board games) is the official
rules "as written" often mismatch from how rules are actually applied.
This is unwanted if you want to avoid unneeded barriers.

So I propose to modify one rule on Proposal process page to remove
parts that are not actually applied and can be misleading.

Removed part of rule is currently misleading as it is not applied in a
long time (if it ever was done). Removal matches rule description with
how they actually work, making it less confusing for people learning
about the process. Having rules stating one thing and actual practice
working differently is bringing no benefits,

It is also not clear who would decide how the threshold should be
adjusted. Changing threshold resulting changing outcome would be
controversial and is not done, if it was something that was ever done.

And it is not needed since existing use is a factor already considered
by the community during an RFC and vote. People are far more likely to
vote against something deprecating major tags, already in a significant
use or being a big change in some way.

Thus, there is no need for an independent criterion regarding existing
use.