[oxoncotswolds] Bus stops imported

[Richard Mann]

I'm just copying anything I find on the pre-NaPTAN stop onto the NaPTAN
stop. I've found at least one NaPTAN name that's wrong, and am using the
pre-NaPTAN name if there's a difference.

Does anything use route_ref? I was intending to start adding NaPTAN stops to
relations, and not bothering with route_ref.
Richard
On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 10:35 AM, Andrew Chadwick (email lists) <
andrewc-email-lists at piffle.org> wrote:

> Richard Mann wrote:
> > The NaPTAN bus stops have been imported (including some former bus stops
> in
> > Queen St... which I'll retag as highway=ex_bus_stop)
> >
> > I think the general approach is probably to delete the non-NaPTAN bus
> stops,
> > and correct the NaPTAN ones (but don't touch naptan tags, except the
> > naptan:verified tag). If there's additional info on the non-NaPTAN node,
> it
> > needs to be copied across.
>
> Off the top of my head, route_ref/bus_routes and ref are probably worth
> retaining somehow, and the node should be added to the bus route
> relation(s).
>
> Those "ref"s I've been adding that look like 69325659 are stop reference
> numbers for plugging into http://www.oxontime.com/ , derived from photos
> of the little purple plate on the stop itself. Probably we should
> namespace the oxontime info - oxontime:ref=NNNNN, anyone? - since this
> number is by no stretch of the imagination the proper reference number
> for the bus stop.
>
> route_ref and bus_routes are semicolon-separated lists of local,
> national or regional bus routes, mostly local. Photos, again.
>
> Er. We should write this up on the wiki or something.
>
> > You can change the location of the NaPTAN nodes if they're wrong, the
> name
> > tag (which should be the same as the name on the stop), and the local_ref
> > (which should be the code on the top of the pole, such as R6, if it has
> > one). If the NaPTAN stop is close enough to correct, delete the
> > naptan:verified tag. If the bearing (the direction the bus is travelling)
> is
> > wrong, I suggest adding correct:bearing=whatever (apparently these were
> all
> > wrong in London, though the ones here seem to be OK).
>
> Bearing is equivalent to old-style direction={N,S,E,W}, for a further
> check on some nodes.
>
> --
> Andrew Chadwick
>
> _______________________________________________
> Talk-gb-oxoncotswolds mailing list
> Talk-gb-oxoncotswolds at openstreetmap.org
> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb-oxoncotswolds
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-gb-oxoncotswolds/attachments/20091022/35c5e0a2/attachment.html>