[Talk-GB] XAPI lagging behind by days?
christoph at b3e.net
Tue Mar 23 13:20:53 GMT 2010
Well, I just updated the Birmingham scheme two days ago to accept
naptan:verified=yes, because Andy asked for it.
Perhaps it makes sense to reorganise the schemes to have only one basic
scheme which displays verification status, CUS and notes/errors and a
number of specialised schemes building on top of the basic one for
information that is not available everywhere like route references,
shelter information and asset references.
On 23/03/2010 12:59, Tom Chance wrote:
> Oh, well, I don't mind really. I've just assumed that the tag should be
> deleted as the Birmingham scheme also shows them needing work. It is a bit
> confusing having the three colour schemes when I'm aiming to fix the data up
> to a canonical OSM standard.
> On 23 March 2010 12:16, Christoph Boehme <christoph at b3e.net> wrote:
>> If you wish I can change the Hull scheme to mark stops with
>> naptan:verified=yes as completed as well.
>> On 23/03/2010 09:38, Tom Chance wrote:
>>> Hello there,
>>> I had a look at the NOVAM tool for bus stops to check my area:
>>> I then updated a load of bus stops, most of which I just needed to delete
>>> the 'naptan:verified' tag from:
>>> But days later NOVAM still shows them as needing correcting, and if I
>>> download the area in XAPI lo-and-behold they seem unchanged:
>>> Isn't XAPI meant to only lag ten or so minutes behind the API?
>>> Talk-GB mailing list
>>> Talk-GB at openstreetmap.org
>> Talk-GB mailing list
>> Talk-GB at openstreetmap.org
More information about the Talk-GB