[Talk-GB] XAPI lagging behind by days?

Shaun McDonald shaun at shaunmcdonald.me.uk
Wed Mar 24 08:13:49 GMT 2010

The route ref is an interim data level until the relations are added. Think of it as house numbers being initially added as points, and then full building outlines being added at a later stage at which point the building number gets transferred to the building outline.


On 24 Mar 2010, at 07:58, Tom Chance wrote:

> That all sounds good, though if we add stops to route relations do they really need route_ref?
> Tom
>> On Mar 23, 2010 10:26 PM, "Christoph Böhme" <christoph at b3e.net> wrote:
>> Tom Chance <tom at acrewoods.net> schrieb:
>> > On 23 March 2010 13:20, Christoph Boehme <christoph at b3e.net> wrote: > > > Well, I just updated t...
>> Yes, exactly. My current plan is to have four types of stops in the
>> basic scheme:
>> 1. Non-NaPTAN stops: Stops without naptan:*-tags. Basically plain
>>   old OSM bus stops.
>> 2. Unverified NaPTAN stops: Stops from the NaPTAN import which
>>   have a naptan:verified=no tag or which are missing the
>>   highway=bus_stop tag.
>> 3. Verified NaPTAN stops: Stops tagged as hightway=bus_stop and with
>>   either no naptan:verified tag or a naptan:verified=yes tag.
>> 4. CUS-stops: Stops with naptan:BusStopType=CUS because they are not
>>   marked on the ground and cannot be verified.
>> Extended schemes would be:
>> 1. Stops with notes: Highlight stops with a note or naptan:error tag
>> 2. Route information: Highlight stops which are missing the route_ref
>>   tag.
>> 3. Shelter and asset refs: Highlight bus stops which have shelter=yes
>>   and no asset_ref or which have no shelter tag at all (this might be
>>   quite Birmingham specific).
>> 4. Anything else?
>> I suggest to keep the old schemes but rename them to the name of the
>> public transport network they apply to (e.g. "Transport West Midlands"
>> for Birmingham), since they are based on the amount of information that
>> is available on the signs used by a particular network.
>> Best,
>> Christoph
>> > Best, > Tom > > -- > http://tom.acrewoods.net http://twitter.com/tom_chance
> _______________________________________________
> Talk-GB mailing list
> Talk-GB at openstreetmap.org
> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-gb/attachments/20100324/ca2ad72c/attachment-0001.html>

More information about the Talk-GB mailing list