[Talk-GB] OSM Analysis New Data and bot
Jason Cunningham
jamicuosm at googlemail.com
Thu Jun 9 16:12:53 BST 2011
On 9 June 2011 15:59, Derick Rethans <osm at derickrethans.nl> wrote:
> I can. I've a friend in the Netherlands that I'd say is the typical
> person that we want as mapper. He had mapped a lot of town Which then
> got wiped out by the AND import, and he didn't bother with OSM for a
> looong time. Luckily, he now finally started contributing again.
> Let's hope he keeps it up.
>
There has been no suggestion that there are plans to wipe out data. The wiki
suggests road names should only be added under the following conditions
- The bounding box for the road matches the bounding box for the OS
Locator entry within 10%
- There is only one OS Locator entry that overlaps the road.
- Only if the 'name' field is empty or missing
- The bounding box is completely within the permitted area of operation.
- Only if no road has ever existed in OpenStreetMap history for the area
with the same name (to avoid adding back out-of-date names)
There is definite room for arguing that it will reduce active mapping in
some situations.
Jason
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-gb/attachments/20110609/c421e86f/attachment.html>
More information about the Talk-GB
mailing list