[Talk-GB] ITO path designation map & designation=unclassified_highway

[SomeoneElse]

m902 wrote:
>
> (See Robert Whittaker's page 
> http://robert.mathmos.net/osm/prow/designation.html)
>

I'd take issue with some of that page - it looks very much like one 
person's personal view rather than a concensus.  Why exactly is 
"unclassified_county_road" obsolete?  It's still used by a number of 
councils and is exactly what it says on the sign.

I'm also not actually sure how "designation=permissive_footpath" differs 
from "foot=permissive" - surely in this case there is no designation and 
it doesn't need to be explicitly marked?

Cheers,
Andy

<http://overpass-api.de/api/xapi_meta?*[designation=unclassified_county_road]> 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-gb/attachments/20120903/3fdf6872/attachment.html>