[Talk-GB] Marking landuse and field boundaries
grahamjones139 at gmail.com
Tue Jan 1 22:10:19 GMT 2013
While I agree that high data density is an issue, I can't see why this is a
strong argument for not tagging land use in rural areas, as even if we do
draw big polygons to distinguish farmed land from woodland from moors from
scree slopes etc, these areas are so big that it doesn't make rural data
that much more complicated, and it will still be much much simpler than a
major city centre.
Unless of course we are talking about drawing a polygon for each individual
field, which would seem excessive - I am just thinking of a polygon for the
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Talk-GB