[Talk-GB] Fw: Fowey estuary coastline problem

Steve Doerr doerr.stephen at gmail.com
Wed Jan 30 11:37:54 GMT 2013


That's how it appears on OS maps, e.g. 
http://www.streetmap.co.uk/map.srf?X=286849&Y=54821&A=Y&Z=115

Steve

On 30/01/2013 10:46, Jason Woollacott wrote:
> Hi Kevin,
>
> Agreed, it looks wrong...  The data came from the OS Boundary Line 
> data, which I took from the gpx trace from Colin's site, 
> http://csmale.dev.openstreetmap.org/os_boundaryline/
>
> I wish I knew the reasoning behind it...   I can understand the 
> boundary being at the low water mark,  but it seems very odd just to 
> draw it across at Dittisham.
>
> Jason
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message----- From: Kevin Peat
> Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2013 9:48 AM
> To: Jason Woollacott
> Cc: talk-gb
> Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] Fowey estuary coastline problem
>
> Hi Jason,
>
> On 30 January 2013 08:00, Jason Woollacott <woollac at hotmail.com> wrote:
>> This relates to some work I did on the Cornish county boundary a 
>> while back,
>> the same also has happened at Newton Ferrers, just south of Plymouth.
>>
>
> I had been meaning to ask you about the boundary changes you made. Is
> it right that the county boundaries now go some way up the rivers? In
> the case of the River Dart all the way up to Dittisham. Just seems
> counterintuitive (+ also looks crap).
>
> Kevin (user:devonshire)
> _______________________________________________
> Talk-GB mailing list
> Talk-GB at openstreetmap.org
> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb




More information about the Talk-GB mailing list