[Talk-GB] Windermere and Rydal Water - missing

Nick Whitelegg Nick.Whitelegg at solent.ac.uk
Sun Mar 24 13:23:48 UTC 2013


Thanks for that.
Windermere is still problematic but I haven't done a lot of work with multipolygons so I'll let someone with more experience sort it out.

Nick

-----Roger Calvert <roger at rogercalvert.me.uk> wrote: -----
To: talk-gb at openstreetmap.org
From: Roger Calvert <roger at rogercalvert.me.uk>
Date: 24/03/2013 01:14PM
Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] Windermere and Rydal Water - missing

The problem seemed to be that the boundary of Rydal Water had been split into 3 parts which, although they were assigned to the Rydal Water relation, had no tags of their own. Potlatch was not identifying the area as water.

I have joined them up, and given them the natural=water tag. Potlatch now recognises Rydal Water as a lake. I chose this approach after reviewing how Grasmere was tagged. I assume something similar happened to Windermere, but have not time to investigate now.

If anyone is not happy with what I have done, let me know - there are always subtleties of these things to be learnt.

Roger

On 24/03/2013 10:47, Nick Whitelegg wrote:

Any reason why these seem to have disappeared or is it just an incorrect edit?

If it's just a mistake I'll add Rydal Water back later, whether I have the time to do Windermere is another matter though unfortunately...

Thanks,
Nick


_______________________________________________
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB at openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb

-- 

Roger Calvert
_______________________________________________
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB at openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-gb/attachments/20130324/16ce0eef/attachment.html>


More information about the Talk-GB mailing list