[Talk-GB] Windermere and Rydal Water - missing
Nick Whitelegg
Nick.Whitelegg at solent.ac.uk
Sun Mar 24 13:23:48 UTC 2013
Thanks for that.
Windermere is still problematic but I haven't done a lot of work with multipolygons so I'll let someone with more experience sort it out.
Nick
-----Roger Calvert <roger at rogercalvert.me.uk> wrote: -----
To: talk-gb at openstreetmap.org
From: Roger Calvert <roger at rogercalvert.me.uk>
Date: 24/03/2013 01:14PM
Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] Windermere and Rydal Water - missing
The problem seemed to be that the boundary of Rydal Water had been split into 3 parts which, although they were assigned to the Rydal Water relation, had no tags of their own. Potlatch was not identifying the area as water.
I have joined them up, and given them the natural=water tag. Potlatch now recognises Rydal Water as a lake. I chose this approach after reviewing how Grasmere was tagged. I assume something similar happened to Windermere, but have not time to investigate now.
If anyone is not happy with what I have done, let me know - there are always subtleties of these things to be learnt.
Roger
On 24/03/2013 10:47, Nick Whitelegg wrote:
Any reason why these seem to have disappeared or is it just an incorrect edit?
If it's just a mistake I'll add Rydal Water back later, whether I have the time to do Windermere is another matter though unfortunately...
Thanks,
Nick
_______________________________________________
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB at openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
--
Roger Calvert
_______________________________________________
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB at openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-gb/attachments/20130324/16ce0eef/attachment.html>
More information about the Talk-GB
mailing list