[Talk-GB] New mapper has imported all Nottingham street lights

[Brian Prangle]

The source is opendata from Nottingham and the data refers to a physical
entity- so why revert it except to enforce a point of etiquett? The
criterion of usefulness is not valid. I thought the whole point of entering
data is that someone somewhere will find a use for it - you might not see
its usefulness, but how can you know if it's not of some use to someone
else? Contact the user and try to engage them - not piss them off  by
removing their hard work

Regards

Brian


On 29 July 2014 21:51, SK53 <sk53.osm at gmail.com> wrote:

> Don't need to say much more, other than it's an undiscussed import and if
> we'd thought it would be useful could have done it anytime in the past 18
> months.
>
> Changeset is : https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/24412110
>
> Will plan to revert in 1 days time if no further action by the mapper.
>
> Jerry
>
> _______________________________________________
> Talk-GB mailing list
> Talk-GB at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-gb/attachments/20140730/8dd7ed32/attachment.html>