[Talk-GB] OS OpenData now OGL
owen.boswarva at gmail.com
Mon Feb 23 16:22:01 UTC 2015
That seems inconsistent. If OSM was concerned about the OS OpenData Licence
before, with respect to OS data, it should still be concerned with respect
to data produced by third parties that continue to use the licence.
The OS OpenData Licence is not "dead" if local authorities and other PSMA
members consider that it still applies to their data. While it is likely
most, if not all, local authorities will follow OS's transition to OGL, OS
cannot speak for them or their IP interests in the meantime. Robert
(Whittaker) is correct.
On 23 February 2015 at 16:07, Rob Nickerson <rob.j.nickerson at gmail.com>
> >I think that would be jumping the gun slightly. What I understand from
> >OS's answer to me, is that previously released datasets will remain
> >under the OS-ODL, and there is no automatic retrospective change of
> >the licence.
> I think you are overly risk averse in this case and it could limit
> interesting uses of this data. The risk all along was that the OS could
> take offence to how we are using the data (the local authorities we forced
> to use the OS OpenData licence when they just wanted to make the data
> available as open). Yeah of course the OS cannot retrospectively change the
> licence of things released in the past but the fact that they have removed
> the licence text from their website and put a url redirect to the OGL
> suggests to me that the OS OpenData licence is dead. The risk is gone so
> lets not pretend otherwise as it will just send a negative message to our
> In time we can and should ask each LA to use the new licence but this
> shouldn't stop anyone from using the data now.
> Talk-GB mailing list
> Talk-GB at openstreetmap.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Talk-GB