[Talk-GB] Quarterly Project: Nature Reserves

[SK53]

Designation tag is already is use to discriminate between LNRs & NNRs (I'm
not quite sure what partiticular status LNRs have but it is referred to as
a designation on the Magic site). Otherwise no: most NRs will be a mosaic
of different physical types, even woods will have rides, ponds, and little
meadows. Parks are a special case: most will think of them as parks rather
than NRs (although visits will be for the nature), which is why I was
wondering about a nature_reserve=yes tag rather than a duplicate way. I
also suspect that most such cases will be in cities: although the odd
country park may figure.

Jerry

On 1 November 2015 at 21:42, Rob Nickerson <rob.j.nickerson at gmail.com>
wrote:

> Do you think there is a need to separate the legal (i.e. LNR, NNR) from
> the "physical" (landuse of grass, wood etc or leisure=park) by making use
> of the designation tag? We ended up doing this for rights of way.
>
> Regards,
> Rob
>
> _______________________________________________
> Talk-GB mailing list
> Talk-GB at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-gb/attachments/20151101/cffd0ca5/attachment.html>