[Talk-GB] foot=permissive in 'paid for' attractions?

[David Woolley]

On 22/05/16 14:55, Nick Whitelegg wrote:
>
> Just noticed two local 'paid-for' attractions, namely Hillier Gardens
> and Mottisfont, both just outside Romsey, have had their paths tagged
> for foot=permissive which seems somewhat misleading given that an
> admission charge is required.
>
>
> My thoughts are to remove the foot=permissive tags from the paths in
> both these attractions but won't do so if this is going against current
> tagging practice.
>

I would think that the path should be tagged foot=customers not 
untagged, although a general access tag might be OK.  Also, if the whole 
park is mapped as an area with restricted access, that is probably 
implied onto the paths.

On the other hand, access=yes is OK for toll roads.

I definitely think that access=permissive is wrong (although most paths 
in public parks should be so tagged, which is probably the source of the 
problem).