[Talk-GB] foot=permissive in 'paid for' attractions?

[Nick Whitelegg]

Hi,


Just wondered what current thinking was on this.


Also apologies if this has come up before, I have a vague feeling it did but some time ago.


Just noticed two local 'paid-for' attractions, namely Hillier Gardens and Mottisfont, both just outside Romsey, have had their paths tagged for foot=permissive which seems somewhat misleading given that an admission charge is required.


My thoughts are to remove the foot=permissive tags from the paths in both these attractions but won't do so if this is going against current tagging practice.


Thanks,

Nick
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-gb/attachments/20160522/0814faa2/attachment.html>