[Talk-GB] Autumn Quarterly Project

[Robert Norris]

Another thought about tagging is when using JOSM what value(s) should be put in the changeset source field.


So far I've been using "FHRS" rather than the full name expansion.

--
Be Seeing You - Rob.
If at first you don't succeed,
then skydiving isn't for you.
________________________________
From: Gregrs <gregrs at fastmail.co.uk>
Sent: 28 November 2016 22:15:23
To: Robert Norris
Cc: Talk GB
Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] Autumn Quarterly Project

Thanks Rob. I hope you don't mind me CC'ing the Talk-GB list.

I've updated the wiki page [http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/UK_Food_Hygiene_Rating_System] a bit but the recommendations for tagging are a bit out of date compared with what's been discussed on the list more recently. It seems generally accepted that we shouldn't add transient data such as the rating.

I wonder if someone might be able to update the wiki page linked above?

Rob - I'd be happy to add a link at some point once it's a bit more up to date. (I'll add a GitHub issue just to remind me!)

Thanks,
Greg


On 28 Nov 2016, at 21:48, Robert Norris <rw_norris at hotmail.com<mailto:rw_norris at hotmail.com>> wrote:

At the bottom of the comparison tool, is it worth adding a link back to the Wiki page - http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/UK_Food_Hygiene_Rating_System - about FHRS and the best tagging practice?

I didn't think this was worth a github issue <OutlookEmoji-?.png>

--
Be Seeing You - Rob.
If at first you don't succeed,
then skydiving isn't for you.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-gb/attachments/20161128/a8a16f98/attachment.html>