[Talk-GB] Autumn Quarterly Project

[Brian Prangle]

Hi John

The need for two sources of information is a only personal preference of
SK53. You can choose to follow it or not.

Certainly we'd like to increase postcode and address data and this can be
entered from the fhsr data. It's likely to be accurate 95% of the time.
Personally I think we can live with this. Hence my suggestion we semi- or
completely automate it (not currently the most popular of approaches)

As always ground surveys win the argument but we currently lack the scale
of mappers on the ground.

Regards

Brian

On 2 October 2016 at 22:38, John Aldridge <jpsa at cantab.net> wrote:

> On 02-Oct-16 17:30, SK53 wrote:
>
>> My personal rules on this have always been two independent sources of
>> information OR a survey...
>>
>
> FHRS data should contain full address details most of the time, so there
>> should be no need to add anything from the website other than the url...
>>
>
> By url do you mean the fhrs:id tag?
>
>
> I'm confused, then, by the assertions on the web page for this project
>
> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/UK_2016_Q4_Project:_Food
>> _Hygiene_Ratings
>>
>
> that
>
> (a) this process might be completely automated [how does that square with
> requiring two sources of information], and
>
> (b) that one of the goals is to accelerate our completion of UK postcode
> data [I'd assumed that implied we needed at least to add addr:postcode too,
> with or without further checks]
>
>
> --
> Cheers,
> John
>
> _______________________________________________
> Talk-GB mailing list
> Talk-GB at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-gb/attachments/20161003/c77cdcc6/attachment-0001.html>