[Talk-GB] Building that have been replaced

me at chrisfleming.org me at chrisfleming.org
Fri Aug 4 15:42:45 UTC 2017


On 04/08/17 at 09:20am, SK53 wrote:
>    Around here (Nottingham) we generally put something like demolished:
>    building=* on the old way. Particular ly useful if you have several active
>    mappers not all knowing about recent demolitions.

This is exactly what we try and do in Edinburgh. An example is here:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/372571074

When something new is build then these will get deleted. We have had
occasions where building have been re-added based on imagery.

We work a similar plan on shops or businesses that close, rather than delete
we would mark as disused:shop= or shop=vacant 

Cheers
Chris


>    On 4 Aug 2017 07:19, "David Fox" <[1]davefoxfac63 at btinternet.com> wrote:
> 
>      Add the new building. We should map what is currently on the ground.
>      Please don't be slave to out of date data or fear of edits being
>      reversed.
> 
>      On 4 August 2017, at 06:42, Warin <[2]61sundowner at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>      How different is the footprint of the new building?
> 
>      I would think that the new building will be of a similar size to the old
>      one - given the planing permissions.
> 
>      So unless you intend to put in the new building .. I would leave it
>      alone - that gives at least an indication that there is a building
>      there.
> 
>      Add a note to say it has been replaced with something similar?
> 
>      On 04-Aug-17 09:37 AM, Dan S wrote:
>      > [3]https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:demolished:
>      >
>      > (your note is not likely to be noticed by someone who is in the middle
>      > of editing, I suggest)
>      >
>      >
>      >
>      > 2017-08-03 16:39 GMT+01:00 Andrew Black
>      <[4]andrewdblack at googlemail.com>:
>      >> What should one do if there are building that have been knocked down
>      and
>      >> rebuilt.
>      >> Loathe just to delete them because an armchair mapper will come back
>      and add
>      >> them back. The new building is not in current bing imagary.
>      >> I have added a noteĀ  #1077006
>      >>
>      >> I am loathe to take photos or roam with a GPS in a hospital grounds!
>      >>
>      >> _______________________________________________
>      >> Talk-GB mailing list
>      >> [5]Talk-GB at openstreetmap.org
>      >> [6]https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
>      >>
>      > _______________________________________________
>      > Talk-GB mailing list
>      > [7]Talk-GB at openstreetmap.org
>      > [8]https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
> 
>      _______________________________________________
>      Talk-GB mailing list
>      [9]Talk-GB at openstreetmap.org
>      [10]https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
>      _______________________________________________
>      Talk-GB mailing list
>      [11]Talk-GB at openstreetmap.org
>      [12]https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
> 
> References
> 
>    Visible links
>    1. mailto:davefoxfac63 at btinternet.com
>    2. mailto:61sundowner at gmail.com
>    3. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:demolished
>    4. mailto:andrewdblack at googlemail.com
>    5. mailto:Talk-GB at openstreetmap.org
>    6. https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
>    7. mailto:Talk-GB at openstreetmap.org
>    8. https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
>    9. mailto:Talk-GB at openstreetmap.org
>   10. https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
>   11. mailto:Talk-GB at openstreetmap.org
>   12. https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb

> _______________________________________________
> Talk-GB mailing list
> Talk-GB at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb




More information about the Talk-GB mailing list