[Talk-GB] Building that have been replaced
me at chrisfleming.org
me at chrisfleming.org
Fri Aug 4 15:42:45 UTC 2017
On 04/08/17 at 09:20am, SK53 wrote:
> Around here (Nottingham) we generally put something like demolished:
> building=* on the old way. Particular ly useful if you have several active
> mappers not all knowing about recent demolitions.
This is exactly what we try and do in Edinburgh. An example is here:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/372571074
When something new is build then these will get deleted. We have had
occasions where building have been re-added based on imagery.
We work a similar plan on shops or businesses that close, rather than delete
we would mark as disused:shop= or shop=vacant
Cheers
Chris
> On 4 Aug 2017 07:19, "David Fox" <[1]davefoxfac63 at btinternet.com> wrote:
>
> Add the new building. We should map what is currently on the ground.
> Please don't be slave to out of date data or fear of edits being
> reversed.
>
> On 4 August 2017, at 06:42, Warin <[2]61sundowner at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> How different is the footprint of the new building?
>
> I would think that the new building will be of a similar size to the old
> one - given the planing permissions.
>
> So unless you intend to put in the new building .. I would leave it
> alone - that gives at least an indication that there is a building
> there.
>
> Add a note to say it has been replaced with something similar?
>
> On 04-Aug-17 09:37 AM, Dan S wrote:
> > [3]https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:demolished:
> >
> > (your note is not likely to be noticed by someone who is in the middle
> > of editing, I suggest)
> >
> >
> >
> > 2017-08-03 16:39 GMT+01:00 Andrew Black
> <[4]andrewdblack at googlemail.com>:
> >> What should one do if there are building that have been knocked down
> and
> >> rebuilt.
> >> Loathe just to delete them because an armchair mapper will come back
> and add
> >> them back. The new building is not in current bing imagary.
> >> I have added a noteĀ #1077006
> >>
> >> I am loathe to take photos or roam with a GPS in a hospital grounds!
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Talk-GB mailing list
> >> [5]Talk-GB at openstreetmap.org
> >> [6]https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
> >>
> > _______________________________________________
> > Talk-GB mailing list
> > [7]Talk-GB at openstreetmap.org
> > [8]https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
>
> _______________________________________________
> Talk-GB mailing list
> [9]Talk-GB at openstreetmap.org
> [10]https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
> _______________________________________________
> Talk-GB mailing list
> [11]Talk-GB at openstreetmap.org
> [12]https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
>
> References
>
> Visible links
> 1. mailto:davefoxfac63 at btinternet.com
> 2. mailto:61sundowner at gmail.com
> 3. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:demolished
> 4. mailto:andrewdblack at googlemail.com
> 5. mailto:Talk-GB at openstreetmap.org
> 6. https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
> 7. mailto:Talk-GB at openstreetmap.org
> 8. https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
> 9. mailto:Talk-GB at openstreetmap.org
> 10. https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
> 11. mailto:Talk-GB at openstreetmap.org
> 12. https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
> _______________________________________________
> Talk-GB mailing list
> Talk-GB at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
More information about the Talk-GB
mailing list