[Talk-GB] tag prow_ref

[Paul Berry]

So, convinced you were talking about me :) should I change *ref* to
*prow_ref* on this and other footpaths I've tracked recently?

http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/464500797

Regards,
*Paul*

On 10 January 2017 at 11:05, Dave F <davefoxfac63 at btinternet.com> wrote:

> This thread:
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-gb/2015-May/017390.html
>
> Specifically this point by Andy R.:
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-gb/2015-May/017423.html
>
> As pointed out official_ref=* is a little to vague. It's always good to be
> specific as possible.
>
> DaveF
>
>
> On 10/01/2017 10:39, Colin Smale wrote:
>
> On 2017-01-10 10:04, Dave F wrote:
>
>
> FYI The agreed tag for 'C' roads was highway_authority_ref as it was felt
> there could be other official or authority tags. It's always good to be
> specific.
>
> Where was that discussed/agreed?
>
> The wiki[1] says to use official_ref or admin_ref.
>
> //colin
>
> [1] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/United_Kingdom_Tagging_Guidelines
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Talk-GB mailing listTalk-GB at openstreetmap.orghttps://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
> [image: Avast logo]
> <https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient>
>
> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
> www.avast.com
> <https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Talk-GB mailing list
> Talk-GB at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-gb/attachments/20170110/ebf71cfd/attachment-0001.html>