[Talk-GB] [Osmf-talk] Live OSM discussion in ~45 minutes (7.30pm UK time)

Dan S danstowell+osm at gmail.com
Thu Jul 27 08:06:41 UTC 2017

2017-07-27 8:57 GMT+01:00 Simon Poole <simon at poole.ch>:
> PS: you do illustrate an interesting point wrt the research we are
> discussing here, one would expect an unbiased sample of OSM contributors
> of size 15 to contain zero non-male and zero HOT members obviously the
> composition of the interviewees was rather different.

A uniform random sample is not really relevant in small-numbers
sociological research. This is "snowball sampling" which is a very
problematic form of sampling, but one thing it definitely does not
claim is to be a balanced random sample. A social researcher using
snowball sampling to find a small number of interviewees knows full
well they aren't gathering a statistically random sample, and one
hopes that this researcher tried to find a diversity of viewpoints for
his interviews (I don't know). He could, for example, have
deliberately designed his sample to have almost-equal numbers of men
and women.


More information about the Talk-GB mailing list