[Talk-GB] Removal of redundant NaPTAN data

Philip Barnes phil at trigpoint.me.uk
Thu Apr 4 09:00:59 UTC 2019


The Telford one certainly looks highly dubious cutting residential areas and bus routes.

I agree these and public transport routes are best left to organisations such as traveline. After all a bus route without timetable information is pretty useless. 
 
Phil (trigpoint)


On Thursday, 4 April 2019, Nick Allen wrote:
> Brian,
> 
> Sounds like a good idea.
> 
> Nick
> (Tallguy)
> 
> On Thu, 2019-04-04 at 09:38 +0100, Brian Prangle wrote:
> > Hi everyone
> > 
> > Back in the day of the original NapPTAN import we imported pay scale
> > areas - tagged as public_transport=pay_scale_area. I don't know why
> > we ever did this - there's no evidence on the ground and it's highly
> > unlikely that any OSM data consumer makes use of them ( if indeed
> > they are still current). The information is better in
> > public_transport applications run by public transport bodies
> > 
> > So I'm proposing that they are all deleted
> > 
> > Regards
> > 
> > Brian
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > _______________________________________________Talk-GB mailing
> > listTalk-GB at openstreetmap.org
> > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
> > 
>

-- 
Sent from my Sailfish device


More information about the Talk-GB mailing list