[Talk-GB] Disused or empty apartments prior to demolition

[Jez Nicholson]

Change it to building=yes + disused:building=apartments ?...it's still a
building, but the original use is now disused?

- Jez

On Tue, 17 Dec 2019, 14:51 Gareth L, <o.i at live.co.uk> wrote:

> There are some tower blocks near me which have been emptied of residents
> ahead of eventual demolition of the buildings. They’re not coming back into
> use due to issues with their construction.
> http://www.mapillary.com/map/im/lzDlWfY8iYo2cUVmO1FNmQ/photo They’re
> boarded up to secure them in the interim.
>
> All the guidance I can find on the abandoned or disused tags are to leave
> the building as defined but to use abandoned/disused prefix on the amenity.
>
> These didn’t have an amenity though. They do still exist on the ground,
> but no longer function as apartments.
>
> I’d like to use construction style tagging, but it doesn’t feel quite
> right looking at all examples I’ve found. e.g.
> Building=disused
> Disused=apartments
>
> What have you used for buildings which are awaiting demolition, or are
> undergoing a protracted demolition process but are not amenities?
>
> Gareth
> _______________________________________________
> Talk-GB mailing list
> Talk-GB at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-gb/attachments/20191217/3afbb3ea/attachment.html>