[Talk-GB] Fw: Appeal for Help - Amending a Route Relation - NCN Route 51

[Warin]

On 20/12/19 00:54, Peter Neale via Talk-GB wrote:
> Many thanks to @Richard Fairhurst, @Warin and @ Paul Berry for their 
> encouragement and help.  I will have a go at making the amendments 
> using the iD Editor.
>
> I'm not sure how soon that will happen, though, as I hear that 
> Christmas is coming and Grandads like me are meant to spend time with 
> their families, not on the computer.
>
> Before I start, I have one more question:
>
> @Richard Fairhurst said, "It's more important that the route is 
> unambiguous,  i.e. the member ways all join to form a single route 
> without unnecessary branches and loops."
>
> However, the Sustrans map shows some dead-end branches (presumably to 
> link into other infrastructure, such as roads and other cyclepaths).  
> There are 2 that are relevant here; one is marked on the ground 
> (probably because it was part of the old route), but the other is 
> not.  I do not propose to include the unmarked one, but what about the 
> one that is marked?  Should I include it, or not?
>

Some discussion on the tagging list on this... a read of
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/hiking_trail_relation_roles

may help.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-gb/attachments/20191220/8828a2eb/attachment.html>