[Talk-GB] Fw: Appeal for Help - Amending a Route Relation - NCN Route 51
Peter Neale
nealepb at yahoo.co.uk
Thu Dec 19 13:54:38 UTC 2019
Many thanks to @Richard Fairhurst, @Warin and @ Paul Berry for their encouragement and help. I will have a go at making the amendments using the iD Editor.
I'm not sure how soon that will happen, though, as I hear that Christmas is coming and Grandads like me are meant to spend time with their families, not on the computer.
Before I start, I have one more question:
@Richard Fairhurst said, "It's more important that the route is unambiguous, i.e. the member ways all join to form a single route without unnecessary branches and loops."
However, the Sustrans map shows some dead-end branches (presumably to link into other infrastructure, such as roads and other cyclepaths). There are 2 that are relevant here; one is marked on the ground (probably because it was part of the old route), but the other is not. I do not propose to include the unmarked one, but what about the one that is marked? Should I include it, or not?
Regards,Peter
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-gb/attachments/20191219/39832a76/attachment.html>
More information about the Talk-GB
mailing list