[Talk-GB] FIXME/fixme/OSm Notes Quarterly Project

Dave F davefoxfac63 at btinternet.com
Wed Nov 6 11:31:52 UTC 2019


As long as all sections have junction=roundabout it will work fine, if 
those creating routers are worth their salt. OSM is geospatially aware. 
Any router should be know it's in the UK & drive on the left & go 
clockwise around a roundabout.

DaveF

On 06/11/2019 07:40, Edward Bainton wrote:
> Thanks both
>
> @Andy - you're right it certainly doesn't!
> As the hospital access road (running ENE-WSW) is merely wide with islands
> rather than formally a dual carriageway, should it be shown as two ways
> like that?
>
> @Dave F <davefoxfac63 at btinternet.com>  When you say roundabouts need
> splitting, will they still get interpreted as roundabouts by routers, ie,
> inferring the direction without a oneway tag, or do I tag the roundabout
> segments as one-way in a circle? (or something else!)
>
> On Wed, 6 Nov 2019 at 00:54, Dave F via Talk-GB <talk-gb at openstreetmap.org>
> wrote:
>
>>
>> http://ra.osmsurround.org/analyzeRelation?relationId=2580522&noCache=true&_noCache=on
>>
>> Click on 'Analysis on map'
>>
>> All bits with a marker need looking at, plus roundabouts require splitting
>> as the bus doesn't go all the way around.
>>
>> This one looks like a right mess given the loop with the bus stop is one
>> way.
>> https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2580522#map=19/52.58839/-0.21216
>>
>> DaveF
>>
>> On 05/11/2019 22:51, Edward Bainton wrote:
>>
>> What do I do about a fixme on a relation?
>>
>> A bus route near me says fixme=check relation plus members - appears brokenhttps://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2580522#map=14/52.5823/-0.2418&layers=N
>>
>> Presumably 'broken' means the route has gaps in it?
>>
>> On Thu, 24 Oct 2019 at 21:18, Rob Nickerson <rob.j.nickerson at gmail.com> <rob.j.nickerson at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>> So far I have looked at two regions in the UK for fixmes: Warwickshire and
>> the North West.
>>
>> In Warwickshire it can be difficult to resolve the fixmes as most (but not
>> all) require a lot of work. I found a completely different story in the
>> North West. I found a good number of fixmes there which had already been
>> resolved and therefore all I had to do was remove the redundant fixme=*
>> tag. I also found a lot of fixme tags that could be resolved just by using
>> the latest aerial imagery and/or GPS traces. Once again it has been a
>> reminder of the differences between places within a few hours of each other.
>>
>> As for adding new fixme tags, I personally haven't needed to do this yet.
>> I am curious as to where "peak fixme" lies. If we had 10% more contributors
>> would we end up with 10% more fixme tags or do you eventually get to a a
>> point where you turn the corner and start ticking off all these quality
>> assurance issues?
>>
>> P.S. The number of Notes is on the up again as well. There are a lot of
>> good descriptions in the Notes that can be used to update the map. Check
>> them out athttp://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-notes-country?c=United%20Kingdom
>>
>> Best regards,
>> *Rob*
>> _______________________________________________
>> Talk-GB mailing listTalk-GB at openstreetmap.orghttps://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Talk-GB mailing listTalk-GB at openstreetmap.orghttps://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Talk-GB mailing list
>> Talk-GB at openstreetmap.org
>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
>>




More information about the Talk-GB mailing list