[Talk-GB] Zebra crossings being lost in iD - how to respond

[Dave F]

On 25/10/2019 12:04, Andy Townsend wrote:
> On 25/10/2019 11:43, Jez Nicholson wrote:
>> +1 for a bot edit
>
> Perhaps Maproulette would be a better option?  Zebra markings would 
> often be visible on aerial imagery, and a comparison of newer vs older 
> imagery might allow people to identify recent changes*.

crossing=marked as a solo sub-tag should also be verified

> * Somewhat offtopic, with almost all of the wood/forest edits I've 
> been doing recently I've used surveys to confirm which imagery is 
> latest (and around 
> https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=13/54.2593/-1.2397 it's Maxar 
> Premium), but using Bing for extra clarity and better alignment, and 
> also using OS OpenData waterway and road centreline data for alignment.

I've found that not only location, but editor can affect the quality of 
aerial imagery. I find it frustrating Bing is displayed at the same high 
zoom levels as others in Potlatch.

General:
I've updated crossing=zebra to crossing=uncontrolled where 
crossing_ref=zebra exists (OP+JOSM, 220 objects). I used uncontrolled as 
it's much more popular than 'marked'

DaveF