[Talk-GB] National Trust Paths organised edit page

[Jez Nicholson]

Community input to the plan is important. Any points you would like to
discuss can be added to
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Organised_Editing/Activities/National_Trust_Paths

On Tue, 3 Sep 2019, 07:02 Warin, <61sundowner at gmail.com> wrote:

>
> On 3/9/19 8:22 am, David Woolley wrote:
> > On 02/09/2019 23:13, Warin wrote:
> >>
> >> On 3/9/19 2:53 am, Dave F via Talk-GB wrote:
> >>> On 02/09/2019 14:58, David Woolley wrote:
> >>>> This could conflict with a trend that I believe is developing, at
> >>>> least for more formal roads, of removing signage, because it
> >>>> distracts drivers, and relying on satellite navigators to provide
> >>>> the information instead.
> >>>
> >>> What evidence have you of this "trend"?
> >>
> >>
> >> I too, would like to hear of evidence of this 'trend'.
> >>
> >
> > Google "reducing sign clutter" for the general principle.  Use of sat
> > nav as an alternative I might have heard on the radio, or in a local
> > paper.  However
> > <
> https://www.driverknowledgetests.com/resources/what-is-signage-clutter-and-how-do-we-reduce-it/>
>
> > is the only reference I can find to that, online, in a quick search. \
>
>
> That is a personal opinion...
>
> v.s. government link to a 3.1Mb pdf below..
>
> https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/reducing-sign-clutter
>
> >
> > I think, in practice, it why local councils often don't bother to fix
> > AWOL and broken street name signs, even when told about them.
> >
> None of these are for the total removal of signs .. but for the removal
> of unnecessary signs.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Talk-GB mailing list
> Talk-GB at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-gb/attachments/20190903/fb70090f/attachment.html>