[Talk-GB] Subject: Re: Thomas Cook shops

[Dave F]

On 29/09/2019 14:03, Jez Nicholson wrote:
> Re: my comment about shop=vacant. I may have been convinced to use
> disused:shop=travel_agent + name=Thomas Cook.

* travel_agency

>   Not sure whether a vacant
> shop with no ghost signage would still be a shop=vacant or a
> disused:shop=yes.
As those two tags have the same meaning, whether there's still a name 
tag make no difference. (Although as I said, I prefer disused:shop).

> I'm not keen on bulk automated closing everything called Thomas Cook
> because the world is more complicated than it first seems to be. I favour
> visual confirmation.

I consider multiple national/regional media reports of liquidation & 
mass redundancy as visual

> Is there a case for automated addition of OSM Notes or Fixmes to
> stores/locations to ask people to check?
My OP asked people to check. No ones come back.

DaveF