[Talk-GB] Geospatial Commission to release UPRN/ UPSN identifiers under Open Government Licence

[Gareth L]

Can’t the key location be inferred by the fact it is within a country bounds rather than redundantly added?

Gareth

> On 9 Apr 2020, at 14:46, Tony OSM <tonyosm9 at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> That makes perfect sense to me.
> 
> Any other views?
> 
> Tony
> 
>> On 09/04/2020 14:31, Robert Whittaker (OSM lists) wrote:
>>> On Thu, 9 Apr 2020 at 14:26, Robert Whittaker (OSM lists)
>>> <robert.whittaker+osm at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On Thu, 9 Apr 2020 at 09:21, Tony OSM <tonyosm9 at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> If the data is to be in the public domain the next step has to be tagging.
>>>> Do we need country specific tags for these two pieces of data?
>>>> What should they be?
>> [snip]
>>> So I'd propose that we use either ref:uprn and ref:usrn, or
>>> ref:UK:uprn and ref:UK:usrn. What does everyone else think?
>> Oops. If we were to use the ISO Alpha-2 country codes, it should of
>> course be GB rather then UK. So that would make the keys ref:GB:uprn
>> and ref:GB:usrn .
>> 
>> Robert.
>> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Talk-GB mailing list
> Talk-GB at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb