[Talk-GB] Street-name toids

[Lester Caine]

On 13/08/2020 10:55, SK53 wrote:
> That was me too, I would have added the USRN if I'd had it immediately 
> accessible. My understanding is that UPRNs do apply to roads, but have 
> much to learn about them. I've added them to a couple of others at 
> Cinderhill which is housing built on open fields so no historical 
> properties there.

This is a case of establishing what the UPRN actually relates to in 
terms of the parcel of land covered by it. There WILL be a UPRN for 
either the parcel of land, or even for the individual fields, but those 
will be superseded by the new UPRN's for each of the subdivided parcels 
in the new development. It is MY take on things that publically adopted 
roads only have a USRN and the historic UPRN is simply that - an 
historic record. But I believe ( and stand to be corrected ) that 
private roads do require a UPRN covering the ownership of the land? The 
UPRN is in essence the reference to the land registration showing 
ownership, and it may be today that councils are registering the 
publically adopted roads as has been seen recently with their claiming 
ownership of land people thought was part of their gardens but which the 
council want to sell them ... even where land registry records show a 
different situation?

-- 
Lester Caine - G8HFL
-----------------------------
Contact - https://lsces.uk/wiki/Contact
L.S.Caine Electronic Services - https://lsces.uk
Model Engineers Digital Workshop - https://medw.uk
Rainbow Digital Media - https://rainbowdigitalmedia.uk