[Talk-GB] Street-name toids

[Nick]

Lester makes a very valid point - the UPRNs relating to roads/streets 
are probably not adopted (certainly the example that I cited in Fife is 
not adopted)

On 13/08/2020 11:21, Lester Caine wrote:
> On 13/08/2020 10:55, SK53 wrote:
>> That was me too, I would have added the USRN if I'd had it 
>> immediately accessible. My understanding is that UPRNs do apply to 
>> roads, but have much to learn about them. I've added them to a couple 
>> of others at Cinderhill which is housing built on open fields so no 
>> historical properties there.
>
> This is a case of establishing what the UPRN actually relates to in 
> terms of the parcel of land covered by it. There WILL be a UPRN for 
> either the parcel of land, or even for the individual fields, but 
> those will be superseded by the new UPRN's for each of the subdivided 
> parcels in the new development. It is MY take on things that 
> publically adopted roads only have a USRN and the historic UPRN is 
> simply that - an historic record. But I believe ( and stand to be 
> corrected ) that private roads do require a UPRN covering the 
> ownership of the land? The UPRN is in essence the reference to the 
> land registration showing ownership, and it may be today that councils 
> are registering the publically adopted roads as has been seen recently 
> with their claiming ownership of land people thought was part of their 
> gardens but which the council want to sell them ... even where land 
> registry records show a different situation?
>