[Talk-GB] Street-name toids
Nick
nick at foresters.org
Thu Aug 13 13:08:57 UTC 2020
Lester makes a very valid point - the UPRNs relating to roads/streets
are probably not adopted (certainly the example that I cited in Fife is
not adopted)
On 13/08/2020 11:21, Lester Caine wrote:
> On 13/08/2020 10:55, SK53 wrote:
>> That was me too, I would have added the USRN if I'd had it
>> immediately accessible. My understanding is that UPRNs do apply to
>> roads, but have much to learn about them. I've added them to a couple
>> of others at Cinderhill which is housing built on open fields so no
>> historical properties there.
>
> This is a case of establishing what the UPRN actually relates to in
> terms of the parcel of land covered by it. There WILL be a UPRN for
> either the parcel of land, or even for the individual fields, but
> those will be superseded by the new UPRN's for each of the subdivided
> parcels in the new development. It is MY take on things that
> publically adopted roads only have a USRN and the historic UPRN is
> simply that - an historic record. But I believe ( and stand to be
> corrected ) that private roads do require a UPRN covering the
> ownership of the land? The UPRN is in essence the reference to the
> land registration showing ownership, and it may be today that councils
> are registering the publically adopted roads as has been seen recently
> with their claiming ownership of land people thought was part of their
> gardens but which the council want to sell them ... even where land
> registry records show a different situation?
>
More information about the Talk-GB
mailing list