[Talk-GB] Street-name toids

[Nick]

On delving deeper, it looks as if my comment is a load of rubbish. UPRNs 
that are listed do include huge numbers of adopted roads - so if we 
could have a list of these and other 'non-addressable' UPRNs, it would 
help users identify relevant ones

On 13/08/2020 14:08, Nick wrote:
> Lester makes a very valid point - the UPRNs relating to roads/streets 
> are probably not adopted (certainly the example that I cited in Fife 
> is not adopted)
>
> On 13/08/2020 11:21, Lester Caine wrote:
>> On 13/08/2020 10:55, SK53 wrote:
>>> That was me too, I would have added the USRN if I'd had it 
>>> immediately accessible. My understanding is that UPRNs do apply to 
>>> roads, but have much to learn about them. I've added them to a 
>>> couple of others at Cinderhill which is housing built on open fields 
>>> so no historical properties there.
>>
>> This is a case of establishing what the UPRN actually relates to in 
>> terms of the parcel of land covered by it. There WILL be a UPRN for 
>> either the parcel of land, or even for the individual fields, but 
>> those will be superseded by the new UPRN's for each of the subdivided 
>> parcels in the new development. It is MY take on things that 
>> publically adopted roads only have a USRN and the historic UPRN is 
>> simply that - an historic record. But I believe ( and stand to be 
>> corrected ) that private roads do require a UPRN covering the 
>> ownership of the land? The UPRN is in essence the reference to the 
>> land registration showing ownership, and it may be today that 
>> councils are registering the publically adopted roads as has been 
>> seen recently with their claiming ownership of land people thought 
>> was part of their gardens but which the council want to sell them ... 
>> even where land registry records show a different situation?
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Talk-GB mailing list
> Talk-GB at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb