[Talk-GB] Tagging of shared use paths
mark at good-stuff.co.uk
Thu Dec 10 19:47:46 UTC 2020
On 10/12/2020 16:28, Ken Kilfedder wrote:
> > I think there are enough items that look and act like a cycles-only
> way to make it worth having a fourth item in your hierarchy- whatever
> the legal position.
But route-finding software needs to know the legal position. Mapping
something as cycles-only, when in fact it can also be used on foot, will
break a lot of valid pedestrian routes.
More information about the Talk-GB