[Talk-GB] Tagging of shared use paths

Mark Goodge mark at good-stuff.co.uk
Thu Dec 10 19:47:46 UTC 2020

On 10/12/2020 16:28, Ken Kilfedder wrote:
> > I think there are enough items that look and act like a cycles-only
> way to make it worth having a fourth item in your hierarchy- whatever
> the legal position.

But route-finding software needs to know the legal position. Mapping 
something as cycles-only, when in fact it can also be used on foot, will 
break a lot of valid pedestrian routes.


More information about the Talk-GB mailing list