[Talk-GB] "GPS trace" tracking county boundary

Edward Bainton bainton.ete at gmail.com
Mon Dec 14 19:21:06 UTC 2020


With plenty of portages...

Glad I'm not going mad. Does it say anything useful or interesting that the
"GPS trace" is a few metres away from the boundary as marked on the map?
(Sorry if this has been answered recently: there was extensive discussion
on alignment not long ago, but too technical for me to follow easily.)

On Mon, 14 Dec 2020 at 18:50, Mark Goodge <mark at good-stuff.co.uk> wrote:

>
>
> On 14/12/2020 17:49, Martin Wynne wrote:
> > On 14/12/2020 17:27, Edward Bainton wrote:
> >> Any thoughts on why when I enable "public GPS traces" in iD, I get one
> >> that
> >> near enough exactly tracks the LA boundary South Kesteven:Peterborough
> >> (at
> >> Deeping St James)?
> >>
> >
> > Someone took their tracker with them when "Beating the Bounds"?
>
> In a canoe?
>
> Mark
>
> _______________________________________________
> Talk-GB mailing list
> Talk-GB at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-gb/attachments/20201214/0f93e00f/attachment-0001.htm>


More information about the Talk-GB mailing list