[Talk-GB] [OSM-talk] Improving ref=* documentation

[Colin Smale]

>     On 08/06/2021 1:52 PM Andy Townsend <ajt1047 at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> 
>     On 06/08/2021 12:26, Colin Smale wrote:
> 
>         > >         There cannot be more than one "authoritative source" by definition.
> > 
> > 
> >     > 
>     Sure there can.  We have lots of places in OSM (including international borders) where authoritative sources conflict.  It's enough of a problem that the OSMF has a policy specifically for it: https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/w/images/d/d8/DisputedTerritoriesInformation.pdf .
> 
Got me there, Andy. The United Nations could be used as an authoritative source, but I think even they acknowledge disputed areas. But I admit I struggle to think of any other examples.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-gb/attachments/20210806/0d6e14d9/attachment.htm>