[Talk-GB] What Relation Type to use for the GPSS/CLH Oil Pipeline

[Tony Shield]

Hi

I've looked at them and my initial thought is that the top level 
relationship you have as route and the lower level as network; my 
personal view is that they are inverted - the top level is the network 
and is comprised of routes.

I'm not a fan of type=group and in my mind loosens the relationship of 
what appears to be a cohesive network.

Tony

On 15/08/2021 13:09, Steve Brook via Talk-GB wrote:
>
> I have recently mapped the Markers, Pipeline, Substations and storage 
> for the old GPSS pipeline running down the Seven Valley, created 
> during WW2 to supply airfields and now run by CLH.
>
> I have created a relation for these nodes and ways and given it the 
> *type=network* tag.
>
> Is this a correct use for this tag?
>
> I have linked my relation to a parent relation of *type=route* that I 
> found but was not sure that it was correctly tagged.
>
> The relations are www.openstreetmap.org/relation/12728963 
> <http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/12728963> and 
> www.openstreetmap.org/relation/12816030 
> <http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/12816030>
>
> I came across the *type=group* tag mentioned in recent [Talk-GB] 
> posts. Would this be a better tag to use?
>
> Any ideas?
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Talk-GB mailing list
> Talk-GB at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-gb/attachments/20210815/f126fdd5/attachment.htm>