[Talk-GB] Misaligned Cadastral Parcels in OSMUK layer?
Steven Hirschorn
steven.hirschorn at gmail.com
Thu Dec 9 22:27:56 UTC 2021
Wow, that's both really interesting and yet also surprising that the
parcels aren't eventually deleted!
Thanks!
On Thu, 9 Dec 2021 at 22:26, Edward Catmur <ecatmur at googlemail.com> wrote:
> Those parcels reflect the pre-war alignment - South Street was widened
> some time around 1950.
>
> Compare e.g. on the NLS:
> https://maps.nls.uk/geo/explore/side-by-side/#zoom=18&lat=51.46896&lon=-0.32414&layers=225&right=170
>
> Ed
>
> On Thu, 9 Dec 2021 at 22:07, Steven Hirschorn <steven.hirschorn at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi All,
>>
>> I was just checking the alignment of imagery in JOSM against the OSMUK
>> Cadastral Parcels layer and noticed that some parcels in Isleworth in West
>> London seem to be completely misaligned. Is this a problem with the source
>> data or the data layer? I'm not sure how to link to it directly, but I see
>> parcels drifting well past the middle of South Street at the below
>> location. I'm not aware of any changes in road alignment.
>>
>> Also I notice that the cycleway relation for C40 includes stretches of
>> footway there, I presume it needs a tidy up at some point. I'll stick a
>> note there as I don't fancy unpicking that myself!
>>
>>
>> https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=20/51.468694550227205/-0.32538885398704065
>>
>> Steven
>> _______________________________________________
>> Talk-GB mailing list
>> Talk-GB at openstreetmap.org
>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-gb/attachments/20211209/7f75c8a8/attachment.htm>
More information about the Talk-GB
mailing list