[Talk-GB] NaPTAN Data

[Jay Turner]

Hi all,

There's talk about depreciating naptan: verified in favour for
check_date:*=*

I'd suggest check_date:naptan:AtcoCode=* or check_date:naptan:NaptanCode=*
dependent on what's displayed. (As that varies regionally)

The message is here:
https://github.com/streetcomplete/StreetComplete/issues/2566#issuecomment-787049474

Feedback requested

J

On Wed, 24 Feb 2021, 22:32 Silent Spike, <silentspike100 at gmail.com> wrote:

>
>
> On Mon, Feb 15, 2021 at 8:38 PM Jay Turner <jaynicholasturner at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>>
>> I don't really know how to analyse the data of the other 65% but I'll
>> place a bet it's not in a great state. Additionally, 95% of all
>> `naptan:verified` tags are `no`.
>>
>> FYI, I think the correct tagging for verified is `naptan:verified=yes` -
>> I know some people delete the tag.
>>
>
> The original import surveying guidelines actually say to delete the tag
> which is likely why it's 95% of the values:
> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NaPTAN/Surveying_and_Merging_NaPTAN_and_OSM_data
>
> I only know this because I did a deep dive into those wiki pages back when
> I was planning my more recent Aberdeen import.
>
>
> On Mon, Feb 15, 2021 at 8:38 PM Jay Turner <jaynicholasturner at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>>
>> *I want to know if it's possible to reimport/mass update NaPTAN data from
>> the latest set of information*. Additionally, I propose a few extra tags;
>>
>
> It's certainly possible to join existing  naptan:AtcoCode  tagged
> features to the NaPTAN dataset and apply tags based on that. I
> originally intended to update the script I wrote for the import to do
> exactly that, but never got round to it. As for the extra tags, there's an
> old thread on this list from when I proposed my import where some
> insightful discussion of the tags to import took place. In the end I
> imported less than the original import because bloating OSM elements with
> tags from another data set is not desirable when the identifiers (primary
> keys) serve as a link. However, I think your proposed tags are reasonable
> and more generally applicable to OSM.
> _______________________________________________
> Talk-GB mailing list
> Talk-GB at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-gb/attachments/20210227/24ccd3b0/attachment.htm>