[Talk-GB] New 'cycling' layer - CyclOSM

[Simon Still]

That tagging looks right to me

I’ve found the paper on impact of painted lanes for interest.  https://findingspress.org/article/18226-cycling-injury-risk-in-london-impacts-of-road-characteristics-and-infrastructure

Kerb separated cycle infrastructure reduced injury odds substantially; by 40% compared to no infrastructure. Stepped tracks were even more protective, reducing injury odds by 65%, albeit with large confidence intervals due to low numbers (0.15-0.85, CI 95%). These findings are in line with Teschke et al. (2012) <> and in London, Li, Graham, and Liu (2017) <>. By contrast, painted cycle lanes did not reduce injury. Mandatory painted lanes did not lead to any risk reduction and advisory lanes (which motor vehicles are legally permitted to enter) increased injury odds by over 30%.


> On 18 Jan 2021, at 17:47, Jon Pennycook <jon.pennycook at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> The photo at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:cycleway%3Dtrack <https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:cycleway%3Dtrack> is what I would call a shared use pavement.  This is what I consider a cycleway=track to look like:-
> https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/yy7FrJIZcEyXft1CqkJaaS <https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/yy7FrJIZcEyXft1CqkJaaS>
> (although I actually drew it on OSM as a separate cycleway because it has traffic calming and crossings that don't apply to the road).
> 
> Jon
> 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-gb/attachments/20210118/9225ee5c/attachment.htm>