[Talk-GB] Anyone fancy a bit of mindless drudgery?

[Philip Barnes]

The same mapper has also been active locally, overwriting surveyed names with an import.

Main error is they have included (STW) in the name. This is not part of the name but the operator which was already included.

Phil (trigpoint)

On 14 February 2023 00:12:14 GMT, Andy Townsend <ajt1047 at gmail.com> wrote:
>A while back, someone imported names for a bunch of sewage treatment works.  They added the sewage works (which mostly weren't there before) and got the names from a Yorkshire Water spreadsheet.  Unfortunately, the spreadsheet had an off-by-one error in it and they didn't sanity check the data.  If been fixing these a few at a time (and also tried to interest the importer into fixing them all, without success).
>
>An overpass query that mostly identifies them is https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1oyq .
>
>As an example, if you pick https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1040548970 from there, you'll see that the name is "Grimwith/STW" but the nearby village is "Grinton".
>
>Similarly, pick https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1040467951, allegedly "Flawith/STW", but near "Flaxton" (and I can vouch for the "Flaxton" being the correct village name there).
>
>There are around 37 to do.  I know that sometimes people "like stuff to fix" so if anyone fancies a go, feel free.  If not, no problem - I'm sure I'll get round to finishing them off at some point :)
>
>Best Regards,
>
>Andy
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Talk-GB mailing list
>Talk-GB at openstreetmap.org
>https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-gb/attachments/20230214/3f6d479e/attachment.htm>