[Talk-GB] place=village|town|city and admin_level tags

[Paul Berry]

I've now fixed this as of changeset 131072017.

Regards,
*Paul*

On Mon, 9 Jan 2023 at 14:01, Paul Berry <pmberry2007 at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Ed,
>
> Interesting example. Ordsall is within East Retford which is unparished
> (see https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/6446737). It shouldn't be a
> level 10 boundary and, as you point out, should be reduced to a residential
> area instead.
>
> Regards,
> *Paul*
>
> On Mon, 9 Jan 2023 at 13:33, Ed Loach <edloach at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Dave F asked:
>>
>> > Are there valid reasons for including place=village|town|city tags in
>> boundary=administrative relations?
>> > admin_level=10
>> >
>> > https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1pUf
>>
>> The first one I picked at random was
>> https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/13687551
>> It looks to be more likely this is a random boundary to a residential
>> area rather than a parish boundary and probably shouldn't have boundary
>> tags on at all. I think what I'm saying is they'll need checking on a case
>> by case basis.
>>
>> Ed
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Talk-GB mailing list
>> Talk-GB at openstreetmap.org
>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-gb/attachments/20230109/801bf74a/attachment.htm>