[Talk-GB] place=village|town|city and admin_level tags

[Dave F]

Please don't make amendments while discussion is ongoing. it just 
confuses the matter further.

DaveF

On 09/01/2023 19:13, Paul Berry wrote:
> I've now fixed this as of changeset 131072017.
>
> Regards,
> /Paul/
>
> On Mon, 9 Jan 2023 at 14:01, Paul Berry <pmberry2007 at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>     Hi Ed,
>
>     Interesting example. Ordsall is within East Retford which is
>     unparished (see https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/6446737).
>     It shouldn't be a level 10 boundary and, as you point out, should
>     be reduced to a residential area instead.
>
>     Regards,
>     /Paul/
>
>     On Mon, 9 Jan 2023 at 13:33, Ed Loach <edloach at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>         Dave F asked:
>
>         > Are there valid reasons for including
>         place=village|town|city tags in boundary=administrative relations?
>         > admin_level=10
>         >
>         > https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1pUf
>
>         The first one I picked at random was
>         https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/13687551
>         It looks to be more likely this is a random boundary to a
>         residential area rather than a parish boundary and probably
>         shouldn't have boundary tags on at all. I think what I'm
>         saying is they'll need checking on a case by case basis.
>
>         Ed
>
>
>         _______________________________________________
>         Talk-GB mailing list
>         Talk-GB at openstreetmap.org
>         https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-gb/attachments/20230109/61b22c5f/attachment.htm>