[Talk-GB] MapRoulette challenge to add highways

[Paul Berry]

If it helps, I've been logging my changeset IDs when closing MapRoulette
tickets (just because it's a habit of mine), so you'll have *some* data.

Regards,
*Paul*

On Tue, 24 Jan 2023 at 13:00, Marjan Van de Kauter <
Marjan.VanDeKauter at tomtom.com> wrote:

> Hi Rob,
>
>
>
> Unfortunately I don’t have any stats on the types of highways that were
> added in the framework of this challenge. It’s hard to track this because
> MapRoulette doesn’t show the changeset IDs connected to a task. I do think
> the breakdown you’re looking for is valuable though. I’ll try to find out
> if there’s some way to retrieve this information—we might not be able to do
> so, but I’ll let you know if we are.
>
>
>
> To your second question: I don’t have road names or street-side imagery to
> share.
>
>
>
> In the meantime, I was able to get some more information about the set of
> leads we will add to the “Add Highways” challenge this Thursday. There will
> be about 800 new tasks in the Southern part of England (including
> Winchester, Southampton, Portsmouth, Exeter, Wells, Bristol, Plymouth,
> Truro, etc.).
>
>
>
> Kind regards,
>
> Marjan
>
>
>
> *From:* Rob Nickerson <rob.j.nickerson at gmail.com>
> *Sent:* Tuesday 24 January 2023 0:05
> *To:* Talk-GB <talk-gb at openstreetmap.org>; Marjan Van de Kauter <
> Marjan.VanDeKauter at tomtom.com>
> *Subject:* Re: [Talk-GB] MapRoulette challenge to add highways
>
>
>
> Hi Marjan
>
>
>
> Yes, happy to receive the next set of challenges! I'd also be interested
> in any stats on what we added in Kent if this is possible. For example
> sometimes I added a service road, other times a residential road and
> occasionally a path / footway. If you have the breakdown that would be
> great, but if not, no worries.
>
>
>
> Do you have any road names along with these? It is a shame to add the
> roads without the names! Street side imagery would also be useful :-)
>
>
>
> You're right about checking all the aerial imagery sources (Esri, Bing,
> Maxar) as - even within such a small area - it wasn't always the same one
> which was most up to date. The other source I found useful was the OSM UK
> Cadastral Parcels layer.
>
>
>
> Best regards
>
> *Rob*
> _______________________________________________
> Talk-GB mailing list
> Talk-GB at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-gb/attachments/20230124/9ba314d7/attachment-0001.htm>