[Talk-GB] Curious housing in Richmond

[Paul Berry]

How are we tagging these?

There are only 4,000-odd examples of building=maisonette or
house=maisonette (I don't think house=maisonette makes sense, personally).

I may have mistagged some as building=apartments, building:levels=2,
building:flats=2, for example, over the years and would want to revisit
them.

Regards,
*Paul*

On Wed, 7 Feb 2024 at 13:56, Jon Pennycook via Talk-GB <
talk-gb at openstreetmap.org> wrote:

> That's the same as a number of roads in Basingstoke and in RAF Odiham -
> those are usually two or four maisonettes per building, the ground floor
> property/properties has/have the front entrance(s) and the entrance for
> upstairs is at the side. I lived in an upstairs one, and it was bigger than
> the semi-detached house I live in now, but with a smaller garden.
>
> Jon
>
> On Wed, 7 Feb 2024, 13:22 Andrew Hain, <andrewhainosm at hotmail.co.uk>
> wrote:
>
>> Some of the three-storey terraces in the 1960s Wates estate in Ham have
>> two entrances to half of the properties and I mapped them as mixtures of
>> building=house and building=maisonette. The ratio and the complete lack of
>> freehold parcels then made me suspicious and I’ve found a floor plan [
>> https://www.onthemarket.com/details/12591677/#/floorplans/1] showing a
>> double width ground floor flat, which implies that the original mapping is
>> wrong. I’m trying to understand these properties and how to map them better.
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> Andrew
>> _______________________________________________
>> Talk-GB mailing list
>> Talk-GB at openstreetmap.org
>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Talk-GB mailing list
> Talk-GB at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-gb/attachments/20240207/b815b866/attachment-0001.htm>